Thread: Using Tri y header

i had SSAC 2.5 wich gave me 177whp and 138TQ compared to 183whp and 143TQ wich is equal to +6whp and +5TQ wich is a good gain just installing it

PD. on a stock internal SR20VE nothing inside but factory.

Do you happen to have both overlayed graphs?

On,mi other thread of the tri y headers theirs both graph the ssac and the Tri y

Mercado,
1. Can you give me an ebay link to the particular tri Y you used?
2. Also wanna know how much modding it will need for VE application (besides the flange)

thnx

Just write b16 tri-y headers and be side the flange the tube position just like the pic above because in the other thread theirs a tube I think its the piston #4 is difrent but in the pic above is the new way

Great idea!

I had a 6whp peakgain with the tri-y over the ssac. 8whp higher revs. modding isn't hard but it is time consuming.. prepare for a 6 hour visit to the muffler shop. clearance is an issue just as it is when installed in a honda

hi

i found a comparison of a stock vs tri-y vs 4-1 dyno on a b16..4-1, the had more power up top, but of course this is a honda
Header Dyno Testing & Comparison, Tri-Y and 4 -Into-1 - Horsepower Gains and Dyno Numbers - Honda Tuning Magazine

do you have a link for the same header on ebay??

That's more like a 4-2-1. Very different from the long primary tri-y's that the guys are using here. These long primary tri-y's are almost like the best of both worlds, or at least a very good compromise.