Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: B14 rear trailing arm movement?

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 43
2013-08-27 15:27:35
#21
Originally Posted by hammerin
Originally Posted by Vadim
Originally Posted by hammerin

No need. I've already done the research. Here's my "findings":

The Scott Russell link type beam blows for anything other than going to pick up groceries. If you want real performance handling in a Nissan fwd, convert to a panhard, or better yet, a B13, asap.


Don't get me wrong, I don't like the SRL setup at all. But with the right spring rates and swaybars, it's not all that bad. Mike K and Joe from 2JR, all have won races and even set records on an SRL... The main issue I have with the SRL is, I refuse to run stiff rear springs on a daily car (P11), thus it sucks a ton.


Oh look, they loved setting records so much with them, they threw them in the trash.

Dog II car: The Dog II

Joe's B15: All B15 Models 2JRacing Panhard Rod




............Its called progression. Also, some classes only allow a chassis up to a certain age, so you are forced to "throw em" in the trash regardless of if the car is fast or not

Also, the DOG II car is still running over the California and still sets VERY fast times (when Mike can drive as he has so many commitments) and the DOG I car is driven by several other drivers (with the most recent being Dai Yoshihara). Actually come to think of it, it ran as recently as a month or two ago in the MPTCC, so not quite trashed. Actually quite the contrary .

The 2J car I saw as recently as April during a local trackday at Summit. . That BEAM car still holds several records at Road Atlanta as well

Only people who hate cars are able to tame the monster known as the BEAM
2013-08-27 17:50:00
#22
Originally Posted by hammerin

Did you mechanically bend the beam or did you heat shrink it?


Mechanically bent it, I don't have a torch hot enough for heating (MAP w/oxygen doesn't cut it still).

Originally Posted by Boostlee

............Its called progression. Also, some classes only allow a chassis up to a certain age, so you are forced to "throw em" in the trash regardless of if the car is fast or not

Also, the DOG II car is still running over the California and still sets VERY fast times (when Mike can drive as he has so many commitments) and the DOG I car is driven by several other drivers (with the most recent being Dai Yoshihara). Actually come to think of it, it ran as recently as a month or two ago in the MPTCC, so not quite trashed. Actually quite the contrary .

The 2J car I saw as recently as April during a local trackday at Summit. . That BEAM car still holds several records at Road Atlanta as well

Only people who hate cars are able to tame the monster known as the BEAM


Hank wasn't bashing the beam in that post, he was talking about the SRL only, two different animals. Beamed cars when setup right will be better then McPherson IRS setups. See the BTCC Top Secrets article
2013-08-27 18:46:22
#23
Vadim, I know he was not, but ze interwebz no convey jokes good
2013-08-27 18:51:22
#24
............Well this thread took longer to take a shit than previous threads. It must be some sort of a record
2013-08-27 18:56:17
#25
Originally Posted by Vadim
Originally Posted by hammerin

Did you mechanically bend the beam or did you heat shrink it?


Mechanically bent it, I don't have a torch hot enough for heating (MAP w/oxygen doesn't cut it still).

Originally Posted by Boostlee

............Its called progression. Also, some classes only allow a chassis up to a certain age, so you are forced to "throw em" in the trash regardless of if the car is fast or not

Also, the DOG II car is still running over the California and still sets VERY fast times (when Mike can drive as he has so many commitments) and the DOG I car is driven by several other drivers (with the most recent being Dai Yoshihara). Actually come to think of it, it ran as recently as a month or two ago in the MPTCC, so not quite trashed. Actually quite the contrary .

The 2J car I saw as recently as April during a local trackday at Summit. . That BEAM car still holds several records at Road Atlanta as well

Only people who hate cars are able to tame the monster known as the BEAM


Hank wasn't bashing the beam in that post, he was talking about the SRL only, two different animals. Beamed cars when setup right will be better then McPherson IRS setups. See the BTCC Top Secrets article


After you get some miles on that beam be sure to recheck the toe. Joe was telling me he's seen more than one mechanically bent beam go back to being negative toe after some use. That why he uses the heat/shrink method, instead. The heat gets rid of any memory the metal has the first time.
2013-08-27 20:30:53
#26
Originally Posted by hammerin

After you get some miles on that beam be sure to recheck the toe. Joe was telling me he's seen more than one mechanically bent beam go back to being negative toe after some use. That why he uses the heat/shrink method, instead. The heat gets rid of any memory the metal has the first time.


Ha funny that you say that, someone I know used a torch to get the toe out, when it cooled it sprung in a bit though. So next day he tried using map + oxygen, and it actually sprung in even more toe in.

Sadly these beams bend easily, but that's the whole purpose of the twist beam setup. This is why even a beam reinforcement bar, aka ADCO "swaybar" still makes a huge difference.
2013-08-27 20:56:41
#27
Originally Posted by Vadim
Originally Posted by hammerin

After you get some miles on that beam be sure to recheck the toe. Joe was telling me he's seen more than one mechanically bent beam go back to being negative toe after some use. That why he uses the heat/shrink method, instead. The heat gets rid of any memory the metal has the first time.


Ha funny that you say that, someone I know used a torch to get the toe out, when it cooled it sprung in a bit though. So next day he tried using map + oxygen, and it actually sprung in even more toe in.

Sadly these beams bend easily, but that's the whole purpose of the twist beam setup. This is why even a beam reinforcement bar, aka ADCO "swaybar" still makes a huge difference.


It's a lot of welding but you could always do what these guys did:

2013-08-29 00:48:19
#28
Originally Posted by Vadim
Originally Posted by malaha5
haha i might raise it if i start autocross again before i can afford that panhard rod. i already talked with 2JR a long time ago about shipping it to me to install myself. kinda weird that i didnt notice the flex before i bent the beam. could be that the tires were toed in a 1/4 in so when i took fast corners it flexed it close to zero, now that its at zero already its flexing beyond it


This could be the case I did notice the beam flex quite a bit with not much force. This is why I'm against jacking the car up by the beam, the body weight could actually bend the beam to have less camber. I bent my beam to 0 toe, took it autocrossing and didn't feel the flex you are talking about.

Perhaps you can describe the issue more? What's going on when you start turning, mid turn, coming out of the turn?

Originally Posted by malaha5
Yeah he normally doesn't ship it out but after talking to him about how I altered his bushings to fit my b14 he said if I'm handy enough I could probably do it with instructions


If you can get it welded Why bother buying the kit, you can piece one together yourself for under $200. Check this thread out.

I'm currently working on a simple drop in panhard setup. I don't think I can avoid welding (not a problem for me), but I do want something that others can piece together themselves without much work.


well initial turn in it feels like the back end keeps going straight, just barley noticeable, feels fine mid corner, then coming out it feels like the front straightens out before the rear. feels like im snaking around if that makes sense. and like i said its barely noticeable. i just notice my friends 240s feel more solid taking corners than my car, like the back end stays put like it should. i havent driven the car in over three weeks due to a JGY clutch failure, no surprise. should be running this weekend so ill drive it and check everything in the SRL. maybe have a update on the cause
2013-08-29 01:14:16
#29
Originally Posted by Vadim
This could be the case I did notice the beam flex quite a bit with not much force. This is why I'm against jacking the car up by the beam, the body weight could actually bend the beam to have less camber. I bent my beam to 0 toe, took it autocrossing and didn't feel the flex you are talking about.

Perhaps you can describe the issue more? What's going on when you start turning, mid turn, coming out of the turn?


how do you jack the rear end up then?

After thinking about it more i think the rear end might just be rolling more then the front around the corners giving me the feeling that its snaking like the trailing arm is shifting, when really its just not as stable like you and hammerin hank said before. the rear springs are only 8k compared to the front being 10k, and i know that the same or stiffer springs work better in the rear.

anyone know how what hight i should raise my car to thats best with the roll center and where to reference the measurement off of? i cant refer to the stock hight because i went from lowering springs to coilovers and i have no idea how much lower the car is from stock
Last edited by malaha5 on 2013-08-29 at 01-19-18.
2013-08-29 13:23:00
#30
Originally Posted by malaha5

how do you jack the rear end up then?

After thinking about it more i think the rear end might just be rolling more then the front around the corners giving me the feeling that its snaking like the trailing arm is shifting, when really its just not as stable like you and hammerin hank said before. the rear springs are only 8k compared to the front being 10k, and i know that the same or stiffer springs work better in the rear.

anyone know how what hight i should raise my car to thats best with the roll center and where to reference the measurement off of? i cant refer to the stock hight because i went from lowering springs to coilovers and i have no idea how much lower the car is from stock


P11 has two notches that are reinforced towards the middle of the car, I jack both sides up using them. B15 doesn't so it kind of sucks, but it does have wider frame rails. I just jack it up in front or middle of the car and rear comes up no problem.

10k and 8k??? Wow that's stiff. I feel like my 4k's are too stiff for street driving.

You will have to do the math for the ride height. If you bring up your FSM, it will tell you the wheel arch heights for stock xyz car. If your running exactly the same tires as stock your job just got easier. If your not, then you need to get the % offset from stock tires, and apply that percentage to the FSM stock heights, and that will give you what your stock height should be on your current tires. This one is hard for me because my fenders are rolled and lipped....

As for ride height, if you keep both under 1" lower then stock most problems go away. Basically raise the rear until the beam is no longer shifting, that's thrust angle degrees on an alignment rack.
Last edited by Vadim on 2013-08-29 at 13-30-33.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top