Has it been done yet? If so how hard is it to do? What parts would be needed? Is there any pics of this being done yet? If so I moight attempt to do it. It would be a sleeper. Lmk
it should be hard at all , ive seen altima's with de's before , should be the same set up
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
'94 Suzuki Swift GT A.K.A The Little Engine That Can - 40 MPG Never Felt So Good
'96 200 SX SE-R VZR N1 Version 1 - Neo AFC, Calum Basic, 9lbs flywheel, stillen cam gears, ssac header, 3" exhaust, Innovate wide band, Tein Flex, G spec pulleys & Apex N1
Them -Is that a 2.0. ME - Naw its a 1.6 Them -
PS3 Tag :Miami4ThatAss/BURN1SLOW
Ill Always Be A Miami Boy!!!
God Bless SEAL TEAM 6
P11 trans with the top mount holes , build the front engine mount and the lowers and it shouldnt be to hard ....wiring will take some effort ... But why ... mildly built KA will make 190ish to the wheels ... Mine '93 Altima SE 10.5:1 comp, mild cams and all the boltons ran 13.9's .... 2850lb car ... And I had a huge list of things that could have made more ...
Back in the day the whole debate on the SR20DET in Altima was every other post .. It all came down to mounts ... if you can get the right trans then its just about getting the others built ....the few that were done made it to much effort when the KA can make just as much or more power ...
VE is another aspect ... Having a lighter engine with better MPG .... If you have an Altima with a bad engine and a VE layin in the corner .... sure I say go for it !!
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
Shawn
Auto Shop Northwest
'98 Sentra SE ..'09 Titan SE CC LB...'93 G20 12.06 @ 119 My Site ..
Join Date: 2009-08-07 Location: Port Saint Lucie, Fl Posts: 198 Trader Score: 1 (100%)
i agree with rodrigo.
i own a 93 altima as well as my 200
and i would rather build the ka then go out and piece together a sr build fabbin up mounts and all