Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: SR20VE Dyno: Stock Cams vs. SR16VE Cams

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 30
2011-04-19 13:10:59
#21
Originally Posted by Andreas
why dont you guys put these graphs on a RPM scale.

130KM and onards says nothing and does not give a real comparison vs power to RPM


Only if your concerned about dyno trophies. Its a tuning tool, makes no difference to my tunes if i have RPM or km down the bottom scale!

If you want to do the maths yourself, sr16ve box with 195/55/r15, 4th gear.
2011-04-19 13:49:49
#22
Also curious how high is the stupid cr
Last edited by cory on 2011-04-19 at 14-08-50.
2011-04-20 02:07:28
#23
Originally Posted by Viprdude


A benefit of applying SR16VE cams to a daily driver is you should get the best economy and having some of the best high lobes of the Nissan factory VVL cam options.


That was my goal, just gain some mid and high end without spending too much and having good fuel economy, maybe I won't be doing 13 second passes but a mid 14's full trim and be around 185whp would be perfect for my daily driven car.

I'll just go with my 20VE cams at the moment, if Somebody's willing to take the 16VE's then I could go over a N1 set
2011-04-20 03:25:38
#24
Originally Posted by billc
Anyone have any straight up dyno comparisons of N1s vs. SR16 (non-N1) cams?


not exactly what you asked but... not back to back but same motor, same set up

just different times

both tuned

sr16ve: +3, -5

n1: 0, -3

i have since adjusted n1 cams settings

sr16ve: blue

n1: red



peace
2011-04-20 03:30:32
#25
why do we keep referring to low end?

who races down low, say below 5000rpm?

peace
2011-04-20 04:18:19
#26
Originally Posted by niZmo
why do we keep referring to low end?

who races down low, say below 5000rpm?

peace


Because low end inertia affects engine torque from every rpm above it.

Affecting horsepower. This is only really relative to dyno figures. Real world situations wont will rarely simulate ramp acceleration on a dyno.
2011-04-21 09:16:57
#27
Thanks, NiZmo. Good information.
2011-04-29 17:37:26
#28
Originally Posted by niZmo
why do we keep referring to low end?

who races down low, say below 5000rpm?

peace


Exactly, in fact, the few times I've been at the track I didn't want to be below 6k. For DD is another story, then I wish we had variable valve timing. But who cares we are not doing this to drive these things on the streets... right?
2011-04-29 18:20:10
#29
For road racing it depends on what track you are on & what gear is optimal for for each turn. If you are doing the 1/4 low end probably won't be a factor since it's balls to the walls but in road racing that's a whole 'nother story. SR guru Mike Kojima isn't too fond of the VE fully bolted on the road course. In his words, "no torque". Hell if I didn't have to downshift to stay in my powerband at critical points I could make up lots of time & concentrate on driving more.
2011-04-30 04:38:30
#30
Originally Posted by blusteelsr20
For road racing it depends on what track you are on & what gear is optimal for for each turn. If you are doing the 1/4 low end probably won't be a factor since it's balls to the walls but in road racing that's a whole 'nother story. SR guru Mike Kojima isn't too fond of the VE fully bolted on the road course. In his words, "no torque". Hell if I didn't have to downshift to stay in my powerband at critical points I could make up lots of time & concentrate on driving more.


Cheers, he does prefer the DE hands down for his application and I agree. The DE is more sensible for the application, imho, also.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top