Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 121 to 156 of 156
  1. #121
    Endless Spinning
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Kansas City Area
    Posts: 2,575
    Feedback Score: 8 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nsusammyeb View Post
    Motor: SR20DET factory bottom end
    Mods: Intake manifold, EQL exhaust, open dump, 6765s billet, ported head, BC2's, 875cc's
    Max Safe Boost: 18psi
    Octane: 93
    Dyno WHP: 415whp/280lbs
    Safe or Tuned Map: Safely Tuned



    I'm having a hard time interpreting your timing map. On the left side it says 'kpa' according to that at 18psi (125kpa) you'd be over 20* of timing from 2k rpm to redline?! Something doesn't seem right about that. What am I missing?
    '00 SE
    “He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever” - Chinese Proverb

  2. #122
    Performance+Plus
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Kentucky
    Posts: 3,419
    Feedback Score: 10 (92%)

    Default

    Have to figure in atmospheric pressure. @ around 22psi would be 255kpa.

  3. #123
    The People's Mod
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Columbia, SC
    Posts: 17,892
    Feedback Score: 16 (100%)

    Default

    kPa for these purposes is almost always used as an "absolute" measurement. 0 kPa is perfect vacuum. ~100 kPa is atmospheric pressure at sea level. 200 kPa is one atmosphere positive pressure relative to atmospheric, or "14.5 psi of boost".

  4. #124
    *BANDED*
    User Info
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: DFW
    Posts: 3,232
    Feedback Score: 17 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    kPa for these purposes is almost always used as an "absolute" measurement. 0 kPa is perfect vacuum. ~101 kPa is atmospheric pressure at sea level. 202 kPa is one atmosphere positive pressure relative to atmospheric, or "14.7 psi of boost".
    Fixed for you.
    02 Miata ---- 06 CBR600 ---- 14 Raptor
    I have people skillz. DEEP Texas. Sarcasm meters may be broken after this post.

  5. #125
    Endless Spinning
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Kansas City Area
    Posts: 2,575
    Feedback Score: 8 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nsusammyeb View Post
    Have to figure in atmospheric pressure. @ around 22psi would be 255kpa.
    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    kPa for these purposes is almost always used as an "absolute" measurement. 0 kPa is perfect vacuum. ~100 kPa is atmospheric pressure at sea level. 200 kPa is one atmosphere positive pressure relative to atmospheric, or "14.5 psi of boost".


    Ahhh! That makes more sense. So you'd be around 225 kpa @ 18psi.

    So now your timing would be under 14*. Is your timing so low because of the ported heads, cams, and intake manifold?
    Last edited by gomba; 05-29-13 at 10:39 AM.
    '00 SE
    “He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever” - Chinese Proverb

  6. #126
    The People's Mod
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Columbia, SC
    Posts: 17,892
    Feedback Score: 16 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wnwright View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    kPa for these purposes is almost always used as an "absolute" measurement. 0 kPa is perfect vacuum. ~101 kPa is atmospheric pressure at sea level. 202 kPa is one atmosphere positive pressure relative to atmospheric, or "14.7 psi of boost".
    Fixed for you.
    That's why I had the ~ there, dick. =P
    Last edited by BenFenner; 05-29-13 at 10:40 AM.

  7. #127
    *BANDED*
    User Info
    Join Date: Feb 2008
    Location: DFW
    Posts: 3,232
    Feedback Score: 17 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by wnwright View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    kPa for these purposes is almost always used as an "absolute" measurement. 0 kPa is perfect vacuum. ~101 kPa is atmospheric pressure at sea level. 202 kPa is one atmosphere positive pressure relative to atmospheric, or "14.7 psi of boost".
    Fixed for you.
    That's why I had the ~ there, dick. =P
    Glad I could 'help'
    02 Miata ---- 06 CBR600 ---- 14 Raptor
    I have people skillz. DEEP Texas. Sarcasm meters may be broken after this post.

  8. #128
    Performance+Plus
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Kentucky
    Posts: 3,419
    Feedback Score: 10 (92%)

    Default

    That's why I put "safely tuned" in the description. Map has LOTS of room for improvement. TBH I'll probably just throw some 112 in it and bump it a couple degrees if I'm trying to pick up some top end at the track. Like if the car goes 11.10 and I want to get in the 10's.

  9. #129
    Endless Spinning
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Kansas City Area
    Posts: 2,575
    Feedback Score: 8 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nsusammyeb View Post
    That's why I put "safely tuned" in the description. Map has LOTS of room for improvement. TBH I'll probably just throw some 112 in it and bump it a couple degrees if I'm trying to pick up some top end at the track. Like if the car goes 11.10 and I want to get in the 10's.
    hmmm, ya 14* seems quite 'safe'. I was thinking maybe it was that low because that's where it was most efficient due to your very free flowing head, cams, and intake manifold. Supposedly the more you allow the engine to breath the lower the advance you need. I'm guessing because there's a greater quantity of air in the cylinder per stroke? So essentially you wouldn't need to start the firing process so early as there'd be enough oxygen in the cylinder to combust at a more retarded point.

    Oddly enough, the timing map from Jack Warrior Tuning at the most extreme point of the map for DET is 19*. For how safe we think their tunes are you'd assume 19* would be the lowest you'd ever need.

    -G
    '00 SE
    “He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever” - Chinese Proverb

  10. #130
    The People's Mod
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Columbia, SC
    Posts: 17,892
    Feedback Score: 16 (100%)

    Default

    All other things being equal, a more dense mixture (more air, and more fuel to go with it) will burn faster than a less dense mixture. That is why "the more you allow the engine to breath the lower the advance you need".

  11. #131
    New Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Jun 2013
    Posts: 1
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    New here, I'm surprised I have never been on this forum before. Just came across this thread when it popped up in another search topic and thought it was interesting and helpfull. I'm surprised to see more and more SR guys using stand alones. This is the wifes car and have been running this map for about 9 years with no issues. You can see the timing is extremely advanced in the idle section which is the only way I could get enough vacume to be able to run a/c, headlights, ext. Only have run 19 lbs through it because I was already running the 52lb injectors at 90% so I didn't want to chance anymore. I just installed some 1000cc's so we can finally push this turbo a little. Also should be installing solid lifters within the next couple of months because I'm tired of shucking rockers and she is itching to hit the road course.

    Here is the setup.
    S13 SR20DET
    CP 8.5:1 pistons
    Eagle rods
    Precision SC34
    HKS 264/272 step 2's
    ported head
    Attached Images Attached Images

  12. #132
    King of Nothing
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: florida
    Posts: 11
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    OOooo Ignition timing discussion!!!


    So, I have some clues. Some variables for you fellows to digest.

    1. Ignition timing that is the perfect number... lets say you are at dynojet. Wide open throttle and you keep adding timing until engine stops gaining power.

    What have you done? You have tweaked the ignition timing such that it is now "perfect" for that exact situation. That temperature, that load, that gear, those variables.

    And what loads the engine on a chassis dynojet?

    .... THE ROLLER DOES. hint hint hint.

    If your vehicle now loads up on the street, the engine will be at the mercy of a completely different load, the weight of itself, including the scale due to air resistance of your vehicle at high speeds.
    In each gear there is a different rate of acceleration of the engine internals as well. Ever notice how you hit boost later in 1st gear than 5th? The speed that the engine accelerates, due to the load (resistance) in each scenario calls for completely different ignition timing.


    So what do we do! On the sr20det, I like to do the following:
    A. I find the lowest numbers. Remove timing on a dyno with 0psi until power fails miserably. The lowest of the low that you would actually still drive the car. To hit 0psi on a turbo engine pull the wastegate arm off the turbo.

    Now, add timing incrementally until power peaks. You add 2* at a time. First step, gain 20ftlbs. next step, gain 8ftlbs. next step, gain 5ftlbs. Notice the diminishing returns.
    If you keep adding timing, you will keep gaining, unless another variable starts to pull out the insignificant gains, maybe you gained 2ftlbs by adding timing and lost 2ftlbs because of temperature increase from previous runs. The point is, realize that adding 2* of timing for 5ftlbs of torque is not worth it.

    Pull it back some. Find your best spot, and dial it down some. 2-5* should do it! not that hard to understand right?

    B. You are not finished. Now add boost, connect the wastegate. On 93 octane, I can usually say this: you will make the same power with 9* as you will with 15*. Ive seen it at least ten real times. The sr20det engines do not like timing. maximum timing on any sr20 producing more than 200 horsepower with 93 was around 10* or less. Forever. All you folks pooling 15-22* BTDC at maximum VE.. have you ever TRIED pulling it back to 8*? Detonation is not the problem; Oh NO the sr20det is very resilient and having too much timing rarely demonstrates detonation when the A/F is in check. No, instead, you will gain a jagged torque line that "peaks" abnormally high, and you will lose horsepower up top, and the major end result is additional wear/tear "abuse" on your pistons and bearings. A built engine would withstand this abuse for years, but most stock sr20 engines lose a ring or spin a rod bearing because of this situation. Furthermore, FWIW, 2JZ engines are AlOT like sr20det engines, but they do enjoy slightly more timing (13* btdc on stock cams is typical at 18psi) in my experience.


    "THE RIGHT WAY"
    I described the feeler method above, by which a dyno is your feeler. The right way to do this is via exhaust gas temperature. Lower your timing like before, use the same method except this time, watch your EGT drop as you add back in the timing. The idea here is to MINIMIZE the egt AND the ignition timing. Dont keep adding timing for the sake of power- let the turbocharger do the work and make the power. If you want more power turn up the boost or upgrade your turbo. Add timing until EGT stops getting obviously lower- that is a sign that you are extracting as much heat from the combustion process as possible with that ignition setting. To get it lower you can try other things: (upgrade your plugs, upgrade your ignition, try a different fuel, try a higher fuel pressure, adjust engine volumetric efficiency via camshaft gears, etc.. ) there are many ways to extract more power from a given combustion event and lower the EGT.

    Thats what this "tuning" is ALL about- keeping the EGT as LOW as possible, that is a CLEAR SIGN that your engine is being efficient.
    A truly perfect car would run on the heat in the air molecules- leaving a trail of colder air molecules behind it. But thats impossible for us.

    /end part 1

    Part 2:
    #2 Engine load. Lets play with vehicle weight for a minute. Lets say you are on that chassis dynojet again. you add timing like before and torque stops going up around 15* BTDC and your EGT is nice and low around 1250*F. Nice. Now, pretend we double the weight of that chassis dyno roller. Or triple it.

    What do you think will happen? Well, for starters, it will accelerate more slowly. The engine will be under more load even though the air pressure in the engine is the same as before. If there was any boost, it builds faster now because the engine is accelerating more slowly and that gives you more time to build boost.

    What about the ignition timing?! As vehicle weight increases (or roller weight) we all realize that ignition timing needs to decrease. That same "perfect" tune from before is now far too advanced, because...

    A piston coming up the cylinder, compressing air, gets an ignition signal that starts combustion. But combustion is not a SUDDEN thing. It takes it's time, it starts off slow, and gradually builds pressure up to a PEAK. That peak cylinder pressure is what blows out head gaskets. Push the timing too soon, and you get a peak SPIKE capable of ruining that head gasket (because your compression stroke and combustion event are occurring simultaneously). You want a nice peak pressure, but not a nasty SPIKE. Keep in mind the rotation of the engine, and the fact that we desire a peak cylinder pressure when the connecting rod is in a position capable of applying force to the crankshaft appropriately. When the connecting rod is out of sync, the result will be lost power. Adjusting your ignition timing by using a dynometer to watch engine torque increase is generally moving your peak combustion pressure closer and closer to the best acceptance point of the connecting rod to absorb the energy, if not too soon (on the EDGE or VERGE of being too soon). The rest of the combustion- the rest of the power stroke, will keep it moving down the cylinder as long as possible.

    part 3: detonation

    I have seen sr20det detonation. The kind that pits up the engine deck, and head, to the point of being trash. It happens when somebody takes a fresh S15 engine and turn the stock engine past 15psi for extended periods of harsh driving. That will eat the engine up in no time, and I used to think it is due to a poor air fuel ratio (14's and 15's).

    I know now differently. I have now seen an engine run at 15:1 around 380 horsepower (20psi - sr20det) and NOT detonate after back to back abuse (five runs, no knock, no visible indication of detonation on any internals after a tear down). What fails first on an engine with just a lean air fuel ratio (and proper timing) is the piston/rings (five runs of 15:1 and the rings gave out on CP pistons)
    I can only stand to reason that it takes more than just a lean air fuel ratio to cause an sr20det engine to detonate on 93. The factory s15 engine undoubtedly pools more than 9* near the upper RPM range for 18+psi because of the anemic camshafts. Most engines with restrictive camshafts demonstrate quite a bit of a timing advance once the factory camshafts are out of capability. You might see it go from 9* as high as 17*. Somebody with one of those maps can verify.

    This is due to a dropping volumetric efficiency. Extra timing is safe when the VE (torque) is falling off. On an engine with a perfectly flat torque curve (and thus nearly perfect VE) you would expect +/- 2* of the same exact identical timing across the board. If you start off around 9* you end up around 11*. Assuming a 4000-8000rpm range. maximum rpm has the final say.

    Part 4:
    Best Mean Torque

    You will see this if you search around other car tuning forums. Evolution engines (4g63) and the tuner "crowd" often refer to BMT as a preferred tuning method when using E85 especially. Its exactly what I already pointed out- remove timing and add it back in incrementally until torque stops going up obviously, then back it down a few (2-5*). The reason I point out the 4g63 is because specifically, you see the most incredible abuse with their OEM turbochargers, and by that I mean, 25-31PSI on 93 octane pump gas, somewhere around 450All Wheel Horsepower. They absolutely max the compressor on those factory turbochargers, on a regular basis. And where is their peak torque timing usually wind up?

    At peak torque, its around 3* btdc. As you run off the right, 8,000rpm, because of a massive drop in engine VE (and torque) the timing will often be as high as 10*. Boost falls from 32psi to about 25psi at that point on the OEM turbochargers.


    Take a long careful look at those numbers. 3* of timing at peak VE (torque), guys, 30psi on 93 octane. Just because the number is below 10 does not make it wrong.
    Last edited by kingtal0n; 10-02-13 at 12:47 AM.
    Likes almeragt, Vadim Liked this post
     

  13. #133
    King of Nothing
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: florida
    Posts: 11
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    I made a quick little excel file, that explains a beginner method for timing an engine

    just. now. cause bored


    This is alot of fun. lets get a healthy discussion from people with dyno experience up in here!!
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by kingtal0n; 10-02-13 at 01:50 AM.
    Likes Vadim Liked this post
     

  14. #134
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: May 2009
    Location: PG County, MD
    Posts: 352
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Thanks for the information, very good read and on par with a lot of the DIY tuning magazines I have read!

  15. #135
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    Excellent post kingtal0n! Now what kind of turbos are you dealing with? Fairly efficient T3+ or fairly inefficient stock sized T2's? My 9.5:1 SR20RR runs a GT28r, at 10-11 psi I'm running 17-18* peak (7,000 rpm). John Kerr and I were making more and more power up until that point basically. I didn't try as low as 10*, but definitely picked up a good amount of hp from original timing 14-15* at peak.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  16. #136
    King of Nothing
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: florida
    Posts: 11
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadim View Post
    Excellent post kingtal0n! Now what kind of turbos are you dealing with? Fairly efficient T3+ or fairly inefficient stock sized T2's? My 9.5:1 SR20RR runs a GT28r, at 10-11 psi I'm running 17-18* peak (7,000 rpm). John Kerr and I were making more and more power up until that point basically. I didn't try as low as 10*, but definitely picked up a good amount of hp from original timing 14-15* at peak.

    Thanks Vadim, I appreciate your enthusiasm for the subject.

    Now what kind of turbos are you dealing with? Now what kind of turbos are you dealing with? Fairly efficient T3+ or fairly inefficient stock sized T2's? My 9.5:1 SR20RR runs a GT28r, at 10-11 psi I'm running 17-18* peak (7,000 rpm).
    All turbochargers can act different under circumstances. Even two similar T-25s can provide vastly different results given the combination of the engine components and air path and more. Each individual car is an individual and the smaller the turbocharger gets, the more personal it gets. The faster you get a response from the combination, the more personal the wide open throttle tune becomes.

    John Kerr and I were making more and more power up until that point basically. I didn't try as low as 10*, but definitely picked up a good amount of hp from original timing 14-15* at peak.
    If boost is always available, even at 2000rpm, the timing map can hit any spot between 0psi and full boost anytime the engine is between 2000 and 3000, because its 2000+ there is no upper limit. It is different tuning the Idle-3000rpm range, and drive train weight plays more of a role in timing advance.

    Examining your particular engine, which I assume also has a typical front mount intercooler, it is 2.0L with a water cooled GT28r garret ball bearing turbocharger on a bottom mount T-25 manifold?
    It must have a full boost potential around 3600rpm.

    and you forgot to mention how much torque, and where. probably when discussing the wide open throttle performance, a dyno chart should be provided for examination.
    If Torque is falling because the turbine is too small and engine volumetric efficiency is suffering because of an exhaust gas pressure ratio it may be beneficial to increase the timing for more torque- because it will promote more complete combustion of the exhaust gas constituents in the cylinder reducing the heat production of the turbocharger. If you are already timed at best torque, obviously you will not add more timing. The only fix for that situation is a larger turbine, or a improved wastegate. Sometimes more boost works, if the compressor can handle it. The exhaust pressure would go up, but so would the intake manifold pressure. If you get more mass on the intake side into the cylinder and burned then of course the engine will make more torque if the fuel quality allows for the blatant increase in compression ratio.

    Anything you can do to reduce the temperature of the turbocharger while demanding performance from the turbocharger will cause the exhaust gasses to take up less space. Which is exactly what a turbocharger needs when the temperature is so high that the pressure is rising in the exhaust manifold to a significant height. Heat is beneficial when trying to get the turbocharger to spin, for the same reason in reverse. The largest mass of hottest as possible air in the combustion chamber makes the most torque- if fuel quality allows. n-heptane is 0 octane, do you think that would work? The reason we usually try to cool the incoming air is because low temperatures lower the sensitivity to fuel quality, AND colder air contains more mass per unit area. Spraying water or methanol into the engine is an extreme example of intercoolering. The idea is to increase the mass of air caught between the valves and start the reaction at the right instant to get the best possible use of the expanding gasses. Increasing the compression ratio at any time (especially by altering the head or piston) will always give you more torque, until fuel quality limits.


    If the torque is failing due to anemia, that is, poor valvetrain performance, the turbo will not be getting hotter if it is large enough. Your particular engine would be held back significantly around 7,000rpm if it has a stock valvetrain and head. The oem sr20det cams always have a trouble with making good VE(volumetric efficiency) after 5500rpm. When VE is lower, it is ok to add timing, just like when you cruise, and maybe not for the same reason. When you cruise, VE is very very low, maybe 25% or less, and air fuel ratio is lean. When you are at WOT, and VE is low, the air fuel ratio is rich, AND VE is still above 100% on a turbo application. At 10psi on that engine you would expect about 170% VE around 5500rpm. Maybe more if it's a redtop with the oem long runner intake. A 12:1 Rich condition cools things off in the engine, egt usually drops, and ultimately results with less horsepower. From a chemistry point of view, the reason that you add timing when VE is dropping is comparing only these: compression, [temperature + fuel quality].
    1. Dynamic compression is lower when VE drops.
    2. temperature is controlled and lowered by a 12:1 rich condition, and fuel quality has the final say.

    A fuel like ethanol has properties that make it a better choice for high performance turbocharged applications, and having issues with heat is much less likely. So using a fairly small turbocharger on a small displacement 2.0L engine with fuel properties that include excellent control of temperature results with better performance.

    Now consider our 93 octane pump gas in the above situation. If your best torque number starts dropping because of this exact situation, (VE drops and 12:1) You can do one of two things. You can either bring the air fuel ratio up, (and thus the temperature), and the engine will make more torque. Also, you can increase ignition timing, and that will ALMOST ALWAYS give you more torque- with the one demand that the pressure in the combustion chamber occurs when the connecting rod is in a position to accept the force. And that happens AROUND Top Dead Center, but for each individual engine, because of varying rod and stroke combinations, and weight and even metallic properties, (and more) is different.

    The reason this involves fuel type is because when advancing the ignition timing you are moving the starting point of the combustion process sooner, and different fuel qualitys have different reaction rates. there is a rate limiting step somewhere in the process, otherwise it would always happen instantaneously. Both cooling it off to (12:1) and decreasing the compression ratio both have the effect of lowering the reaction rate, which could be compensated by with an earlier ignition point.

    In your particular situation, if you had FOUND best torque already previously around 5500rpm, whatever maximum timing displayed there at that point might also be slower than necessary for best torque when compression starts to fall. On the other hand...

    There are other reasons to consider adding timing is when the engine needs it strictly due to rpm increase. This could be because of actual timing at the crankshaft beginning to waver from displayed values on a computer- (have you actually verified the engine timing at 7,000rpm? That sounds dangerous and difficult even on a dyno) Or because of one of many other reasons, as I will quote
    patprimmer (Publican)
    30 Jul 07 9:04
    The advance rate is not linear to rpm.

    The advance does not always increase with rpm, and at very high rpm, some engines respond to some top end retard.

    Some factors that change burn rate are, compression ratio, charge temperature, a:f ratio, fuel particle size and degree of vaporisation.

    Typically at around 3000 rpm, the turbulence increases burn rate to an extent that no further advance is required.
    http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=193560


    Always good to have results to analyze to figure things out. If you want I will post some of mine.

    Also
    http://www.contactmagazine.com/Issue...ineBasics.html

    I just want to add that I literally googled those two websites at the original time of this posting. The information is out there, some of it is accurate, but what really is truly for every single engine in turn? I just felt those two websites were helpful from the frame of mind of the original question, as to be helpful when discussing ignition timing and detonation.
    The overall syntrast, comparison, meaning of this post is a more general look at combustion engines as individual exceptions to each rule in turn. You modify something- you break a different rule.

    The combustion of gasoline involves intermediates. To be honest, I am not a gasoline inspector, but I could imagine that different fuels (93 octane) from different sources will sometimes give different results. But they all say 93, and they are all mostly just light 8 carbon chains. Sometimes (usually?) there are additives.
    Last edited by kingtal0n; 10-06-13 at 09:06 PM.
    Likes Vadim Liked this post
     

  17. #137
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Posts: 41
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    stock 1995 auto G20 ecu

  18. #138
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Posts: 41
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    stock 1994 B13 Auto sr20de

  19. #139
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    @kingtal0n thanks for another great post. What I was referring to is, our FWD SR20's are not efficient enough (RWD is probably the same) with stock parts to run max of 10* at say 10psi. Now if your run a free flowing enough of an exhaust mani, plus a giant turbo like say 6262, then 10psi is going to yield you enough power that 10* would be more then enough.

    It is all about efficiency of your setup though. When I had an SR20VE, switching to VET cams (smaller low lobes then VE cams), I had to increase timing majorly to gain back the low end torque and MPG. What I'm referring to is, the more efficient your setup (Intake, cams, exhaust), the less timing you need to get MBT.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  20. #140
    King of Nothing
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: florida
    Posts: 11
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    You are saying timing follows VE, which is generally true. You should be aware that there are exceptions, such as when the intake charge is being trashed or contaminated by the valvetrain profile, or EGR or exhaust gas scavenging effects.

  21. #141
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kingtal0n View Post
    You are saying timing follows VE, which is generally true. You should be aware that there are exceptions, such as when the intake charge is being trashed or contaminated by the valvetrain profile, or EGR or exhaust gas scavenging effects.
    Oh I had my fair share of issues with that one too, Log manifold + 48* (VVL) of overlap = unhappy motor. Fix there is a good flowing manifold, but by that point I wanted to go simple, so swapped a roller rocker motor back in with under 10* of overlap, no more reversion and detonation.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  22. #142
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Posts: 41
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    does anyone have the OBD1 G20 stock timing map???

  23. #143
    The People's Mod
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Columbia, SC
    Posts: 17,892
    Feedback Score: 16 (100%)

    Default

    @bhowle
    The VEMS map I sent you wasn't the last one (which makes sense because the older one I sent you was insane). The one in this thread was the last one. There are also lots of maps in here for you to look at and get ideas from. Lots of very advanced idle sections just as you've gravitated toward, etc.

    I'm not convinced most of these aren't freshman attempts but there are things to be learned in this thread.

  24. #144
    Turbo Sr20
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Plantation, Florida
    Posts: 940
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default megasquirt

    Hey guys I am going to revive this thread if anyone can still give me some input. I just bought a megasquirt 2 for me se-r and I'm trying to figure out how to do the ignition mapping. My setup is a stock bottom end sr20de just rebuilt with new bearings, rings, arp headstuds etc.
    I have a garret super 60 top mounted turbo with BC2 cams and msd 50lb injectors. Front mount intercooler and 3" open downpipe.
    Which timing table do you think would be the best to start with as a base for my setup?
    Race Car: B13 Sr20de+t Garret 60 trim, BC2 cams, 50lb injectors, ACT 6 puck and HD pp :bigthumbup:
    Daily Driver: G20T Sr20de

  25. #145
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Location: Virginia
    Posts: 1,208
    Feedback Score: 7 (100%)
    03 supercharged xterra
    00 Infiniti G20t: Ignition upgrade in development

  26. #146
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Wildomar, California, United States
    Posts: 134
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SneakyOwner View Post
    Hey guys I am going to revive this thread if anyone can still give me some input. I just bought a megasquirt 2 for me se-r and I'm trying to figure out how to do the ignition mapping. My setup is a stock bottom end sr20de just rebuilt with new bearings, rings, arp headstuds etc.
    I have a garret super 60 top mounted turbo with BC2 cams and msd 50lb injectors. Front mount intercooler and 3" open downpipe.
    Which timing table do you think would be the best to start with as a base for my setup?
    Post your MSQ ... I will set you up with something to start with.
    Likes gEE805 Liked this post
     

  27. #147
    The People's Mod
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Columbia, SC
    Posts: 17,892
    Feedback Score: 16 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BenFenner View Post
    Bumping this to remind myself to finally post up my own turbo timing map as it has stood the test of time and I'm finally comfortable that it is safe.
    Grr, need to add this to my TODO list.

    @SneakyOwner when I get to a network that doesn't block images I will try to offer some advice. Generally speaking you will flow less air than most below ~3,500 RPM so you'll want to maintain typical settings or maybe raise the timing a little bit there. Then you will flow a good bit more than most above that RPM so you will want to back things off 15% or so above that. Assuming you start from an ignition map for something with stock cams and a smaller T2 turbo.
    Last edited by BenFenner; 06-26-15 at 04:04 PM.

  28. #148
    New Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Mar 2017
    Posts: 1
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Question, and i hope this is an acceptable place to ask this.

    What effect does the advance in the low load high rpm area, i see that it ranged from 34 to 42 depending on the map. Just curious in the difference?

  29. #149
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Wildomar, California, United States
    Posts: 134
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default Timing Maps for Tuning

    Quote Originally Posted by uncommoncents View Post
    Question, and i hope this is an acceptable place to ask this.

    What effect does the advance in the low load high rpm area, i see that it ranged from 34 to 42 depending on the map. Just curious in the difference?
    Just efficiencies of combustion. Nothing you will notice. I run about 40deg down low above 3500rpm and up


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  30. #150
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    Funny thing, sometimes running that much timing is to inefficiencies of combustion. On two different motors that I did airflow mods to (aka bigger turbo) I saw MPG increase only after reducing low end timing.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  31. #151
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2009
    Posts: 238
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Been reading and digesting a lot of info from this thread. Awesome Thread!!!
    New to engine tuning and just recently installed a nistune board on my ecu. The ECU I had before was a JUN ecu which had a daughter board as well so it was a easy pull out JUN board and plug in Nistune board.

    I have a completely stock GTi-R sr20det with JWT S3 and Gt2871R turbo(max boost 18psi) and z32 Maf
    I have been slowly working on the timing map to smooth some areas out and so far so good. I have no Dyno to tune on so it is all street tuning. I am looking more for Low-Mid range power/torque and up high to be a safe tune.

    So far I like the setup and response but I feel there is room for improvement. I know a new billet turbo would do the trick but I am not ready to spend out on a new turbo.

    Let me know what you all think

    Motor: Gti-R SR20DET (Stock)
    Mods: Custom turbo outlet w/screamer pipe, 3" exhaust, FMIC, JWT S3, GT2871R
    Max Safe Boost:18
    Octane:93
    Dyno WHP:?
    Safe or Tuned Map:Tuned

    Timing Map:
    Last edited by cayman_primera; 06-01-17 at 02:34 PM.

  32. #152
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    You're running quite a bit of timing down low, do you have a graph of your boost pressure vs rpm?

    Does nistune let you do logs? If so you can do 2-4th gear runs on a straight road and plop it into Virtual Dyno to get some good baseline numbers.

    I'll post an example of how virtual dyno looks like in my next reply with my tuned map.
    Last edited by Vadim; 06-06-17 at 08:42 PM.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  33. #153
    SR20VENENO
    User Info
    Join Date: Apr 2015
    Location: COLORADO
    Posts: 391
    Feedback Score: 4 (100%)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadim View Post
    You're running quite a bit of timing down low, do you have a graph of your boost pressure vs rpm?

    Does nistune let you do logs? If so you can do 2-4th gear runs on a straight road and plop it into Virtual Dyno to get some good baseline numbers.

    I'll post an example of how virtual dyno looks like in my next reply with my tuned map.
    Sub'd
    Started from the bottom Now we're here?

  34. #154
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default 135k G20 Roller Rocker - GT28r

    135k G20 Roller Rocker - GT28r


    Motor: 135k Mile SR20DE Roller Rocker 9.5cr
    Mods: Gt28r, Avenir T25 Turbo Manifold, 3" Exhaust, Low Port Intake Manifold, VE Valve Springs, FMIC, 3" WAI
    Max Safe Boost: 15psi
    Octane: Shell 93
    Dyno WHP: 243whp / 234ft-lbs @10psi peak
    Safe or Tuned Map: Tuned Map

    Timing Map: Please note the approximate PSI ranges are listed in red above the MAF Load scales:


    Virtual Dyno Graph to show AFR, Boost, and Power Curve
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

  35. #155
    Member
    User Info
    Join Date: Oct 2009
    Posts: 238
    Feedback Score: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadim View Post
    You're running quite a bit of timing down low, do you have a graph of your boost pressure vs rpm?

    Does nistune let you do logs? If so you can do 2-4th gear runs on a straight road and plop it into Virtual Dyno to get some good baseline numbers.

    I'll post an example of how virtual dyno looks like in my next reply with my tuned map.
    Hopefully the pic works, just did this run today but i dont have a boost signal in the ecu. At peak power boost does spike up to 22psi then drops to 18
    Last edited by cayman_primera; 06-07-17 at 09:18 PM.

  36. #156
    Administrator
    User Info
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: VA
    Posts: 16,175
    Feedback Score: 48 (100%)

    Default

    I can see why your running so much timing down low, looks like you are full boosting at 5200rpm which means needing more timing until you spool up. Here is what I would do, fire up a 2D graph, that 3D graph is useless and doesn't show you any real spikes. Go column by column to smooth the timing, then go row by row to smooth it more. This will make your power delivery much more linear.

    Here is an example from my 2005 Legacy GT Timing map. The first map is based on the stock Legacy GT map that I tweaked here and there for my downpipe and other mods. Second map is me taking couple hours to smooth out the X and Y axis as much as possible. The difference is a much smoother operating motor and more overall power.


    Also, I would knock the smoothing down to 2 or 3, it helps reduce some of the spikiness. Generally you want to have no more then 10whp loss between smoothing 1 and smoothing 6. If it is more then 10whp difference then your road or run is not good.


    Next I'll share a little timing tuning advice that I use to find Maximum Best Torque (MBT), I like to think of it as minimum best timing, because less more when it comes to timing. Once you have your timing map smoothed, take that tune and subtract 2* of timing across the whole map.

    Go find a good straight road and do 3 WOT runs to heat soak all the components, since your first 3 pulls will make more power then following pulls. Now that your car is warmed up, do two or three pulls with your base tune. Now upload your -2* map, go to the same road and do two or three pulls in same gear and make sure you start on the same parts of the road.

    Open those logs with Virtual Dyno, see if -2* map lost power compared to the base map, if it did, add timing in 2* increments until you stop gaining power then subtract 2* for safety. Now If your power stayed the same on the -2* map, you are past MBT and need to reduce timing further. Keep on reducing timing till you start loosing power, don't be surprised if you gain power when you reduce timing!

    Most likely you will not get power increase or decrease across the whole range, this is where you morph the two timing maps together, which will net you power gains across the whole range vs the base map.

    I use this method for tuning any mods I do now, even tuning the fuel map would require a different timing map. Just make sure to be safe when doing this on the street.
    Last edited by Vadim; 06-07-17 at 11:35 PM.
    00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
    05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
    12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

 

 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top