Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Another clean one for sale!

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 51-60 of 80
2012-08-08 20:36:12
#51
Originally Posted by SE-RMonkey



Car had no report for 10 years? Hmmm? Fuel injectors replaced?
Last edited by Mr SE-R on 2012-08-08 at 20-38-11.
2012-08-08 20:48:17
#52
Look at that, went between 92 and 2012 between THE ACTUAL MILAGE REPORTS. so that means 3/5/12 at 46,389 could of put that cluster in and took in and it was reported at that mileage since 1992.

Now if was steady reporting at every date, that would be different. But every other registration date their is nothing, yet this year he made sure it was reported on the title. HMM

Do you smell that...Cuz something dont smell right, its funny the year it is getting sold that is the year that ACTUAL MILEAGE reporting gets done on carfax. Hmm interesting dont you think.
Last edited by danfiveten on 2012-08-08 at 20-49-09.
2012-08-08 21:05:59
#53
Every state reports differently. Mileage was reported when new in SC and when it changed hands in VA. Bottom line? That report doesn't prove the car has 47K on it any better than the pictures and opinions floating around here proves that it doesn't. I'm not questioning anyone's knowledge, I'm simply stating the fact that we have nothing to prove or disprove otherwise.
2012-08-08 21:55:04
#54
Originally Posted by danfiveten
Rather buy this one
1993 Nissan Sentra SE-R 2D

That looks realistically priced after a bit of haggling.

Originally Posted by Andreas
A car can get into a crash twice a year and be fixed by the owner and nothing shows up. Crashes only show up if they are reported to the insurance.

Case in point. Any insurance company in the world would have totaled my Classic back when I wrecked it in 2007. Which is why it never got reported to anyone. I fixed it with out-of-pocket cash.

My Car Fax might show a fairly minor wreck waaaaay back in the mid-90's, fixed at the dealer. But there is no way Car Fax knows about the 2007 wreck.

Originally Posted by SE-RMonkey
I'm not questioning anyone's knowledge, I'm simply stating the fact that we have nothing to prove or disprove otherwise.

Good because we all remember jamanrr. He also disagreed with Miko about the mileage on a vehicle. ..............

http://www.sr20-forum.com/nx2000/33458-apparently-not-so-mint-32-000-mile-nx-ebay.html
2012-08-08 23:06:42
#55
Shawn B beat me to it with the jamanrr comment....I started that thread.LOL
This car has over 100,000 miles,no doubt about it.

Its kinda funny the guy would not put a new knob and steering wheel on though...I mean...come on.
If you are gonna try to mislead someone,do it right.LOL
2012-08-08 23:37:18
#56
This is all conjecture, still.
Last edited by SE-RMonkey on 2012-08-08 at 23-38-21.
2012-08-08 23:47:35
#57
Originally Posted by Shawn

Originally Posted by SE-RMonkey
I'm not questioning anyone's knowledge, I'm simply stating the fact that we have nothing to prove or disprove otherwise.

Good because we all remember jamanrr. He also disagreed with Miko about the mileage on a vehicle. ..............

http://www.sr20-forum.com/nx2000/33458-apparently-not-so-mint-32-000-mile-nx-ebay.html


I made it to page 10.
2012-08-09 01:31:29
#58
lets take a look at the red SER. Listed with 172,000 miles at $2988.

Looks way way cleaner under the hood and has the OEM terminal.



The rims look just as good as the white SER with 47,000 miles.



The trunk capet looks brand new



The steeing wheel looks in way better condition. I wonder why.... and thats with 130,00 miles more.

Last edited by Andreas Miko on 2012-08-09 at 01-32-19.
2012-08-09 01:51:23
#59
it seems that VA has a lot of these low miles B13, this is like what #5?
2012-08-09 01:52:10
#60
Originally Posted by Andreas
lets take a look at the red SER. Listed with 172,000 miles at $2988.

Looks way way cleaner under the hood and has the OEM terminal.



The rims look just as good as the white SER with 47,000 miles.



The trunk capet looks brand new



The steeing wheel looks in way better condition. I wonder why.... and thats with 130,00 miles more.



Agreed, looks great, although some might find it odd that it looks as good as it does with so many miles. Like a 70 year old hag who's had tons of plastic surgery. Her face may look good, then you look closer at the saggy neck and wrinkled hands.

My '92 with 116k looks better in some respects than the 47k example, but it still does not disprove that the 47k miles are true. Does it look suspect based on the mentioned observations? Sure, but unless you personally know the history of the car you cannot state the miles are untrue as fact.
Last edited by SE-RMonkey on 2012-08-09 at 01-59-09.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top